>... as for appropriate, that's a judgement call >based on personal preference.
mm.. he also did add: "Note that I personally think it is unfortunate that the WAI WCAG guidelines mandate this. (I appreciate that the word 'appropriate' could be interpreted as a get-out - but I would argue that XHTML is appropriate for the task of document markup)." >XHTML did not replace HTML or it would have been called HTML 5.0. indeed. agreed. i guess his addy is in the archives, if u'd like to take it up with him :) kind regards Peter, vicki. ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
