Lachlan wrote:
>> On use of validation: valid code is not difficult.
&
>> Pete, I'm assuming from your comments that you aim for valid code by
changing institutional practices rather than programmatically?
Agreed on both.
The reality in big organisations is developers have a long list of things to do and correcting code that may not be causing a problem for the business right now, today, in $ terms, usually doesn't get a high priority on that list. and pages consequently sit there, invalid.
Of course its the purpose of this list and all of us on it to re/educate people/clients, highlight the benefits, & reverse that practice so we get this thing right.
pete
