Hmmm... > but it was also pointed out .... > > <paste> > Note that a strict interpretation of the WAI WCAG 1.0 guidelines would > indicate that you MUST use XHTML 1.0 if you intent to comply > with WAI AA > guidelines. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/>
Um, no. Not MUST at all. This is misinterpreting the facts. > Checkpoints: > 11.1 Use W3C technologies when they are available and > appropriate for a > task and use the latest versions when supported. [Priority 2] > </paste> I would think that IE's non support of the correct mime type means that "when supported" fails, and as for appropriate, that's a judgement call based on personal preference. HTML 4.01 is still entirely appropriate for general content mark-up and IS the latest version of HTML. What they mean here is that HTML 4.0 is not appropriate, (and it's debateable whether HTML 3.2 is either... By "version" do they mean the language or the subset? HTML 3.2 is the latest version of HTML 3) XHTML did not replace HTML or it would have been called HTML 5.0. P ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
