> From: Dave Lyons > then ur on some SERIOUS crack > i mean serious crack
no need for that... > dhtml will never be flash, never be supported like flash and > will never have the ease of use as flash, never have the > portability as flash, it cant use remoting (at least in a > legal secure way. I'm all for using flash when it's appropriate, but in terms of graceful degradation and accessibility, and obviously depending on the specific application, a bit of conscienciously written and implemented javascript can help add interactive functionality without the need to create a completely separate, non-flash alternative. Admittedly though, both Schiller example sites are just a bit over the top - good proof of concept, but not really to be used for proper commercial sites (and yes, they haven't been coded with graceful degradation in mind at all) Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
