Re: [WSG] Does anyone still design for 640x480?

[David Pietersen]

Visitors to my State Government site are almost divided exactly in half between 800x600 and 1024x768, based on around 30,000 unique visits per day, and we actually provide 2 versions of our site through testing the res before we render the HTML.

 

There is a growing percentage of those with 1280x1024, but it is still tiny compared to the other two I mentioned. 

 

We get a VERY small hand full at 640x480, which I suspect is two or three regular visitors.

 

 

On 03/08/05, Michael Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yes, I know a good design will scale for any size screen (resolution if you prefer that term)  but most designers I know pick a minimum size and work out their designs with this as a normal minimum.  Any smaller sizes they just make the site work but not fret if things are not perfectly aligned.

 

For example, I usually design pages that work well in screens 800x600 or larger but in smaller screens, everything will be there but if lines have wrapped horribly or tabs and boxes have dropped down to a new line, I'm not going to worry.

Is that what you are all doing nowdays?   What sizes are you designing for?

 

 

Cheers

Mike Kear

Windsor, NSW, Australia

Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer

AFP Webworks Pty Ltd

http://afpwebworks.com

Full Scale ColdFusion hosting from A$15/month