Yes, it is still worth it because those people who do know really, really 
appreciate it. 
They *hate* it when a site doesn't allow them to resize the font. Those who 
I've spoken 
with have a much stronger attachment to sites that work for them, which should 
be 
important to all clients.

I've not figured out how to let people know about it apart from showing anyone 
who 
comments that the text size on a site is too small. I also haven't figured out 
how to tell 
people about this feature on a site - 'accessibility' is probably not a great 
label. 

That said, can I rewrite your accessibilty statement for you (it's a bit 
passive and 
geeky)?:

"Does the text look too small to you? This site contains 'relative fonts' which 
can easily 
be made larger or smaller as you need. If you are using Internet Explorer, you 
can do 
this by selecting 'View>Text size>Largest'. "

Donna

On 2 Sep 2005 at 10:56, Richard Czeiger wrote:

> 
> Thanks Donna - Nice to hear from a usability professional.
> I guess this raises the question: If we're all going hell-for-leather
> making fluid siteswith relative fonts for increased usability /
> accessibility and no one knows about it or how to use it, then:
> 
> a) Is it worth the effort? 
> Emotionally, I'd say 'yes'. I want to do the right thing, but if
> testing, debugging and getting it to work properly is an extra 2 - 3
> hours of development time then is it worth it economically (for my
> client)?
> 
> b) How do we tell people about it?
> What's the best way to spread the word?
> In my sites' Accessibility Statement, I have the following text:
> ------------
> This site uses only relative font sizes, compatible with the
> user-specified "text size" option in visual browsers. This option can
> be adjusted by the user, allowing them to change the text size of
> their browser. ------------
> 
> But is it enough? How many people read my beautifully written
> Accessibility Statement anyway? Should I be putting up a separate page
> "How to change your text size" and link to it in the footer of every
> page? If so, my footers are getting a little crowded... 1. Copyright
> 2. Disclaimer 3. Privacy 4. Accessibility 5. Site Map Now.. 6. Change
> Text Size
> 
> Seems a bit like overkill, no?
> 
-- 
Donna Maurer
Maadmob Interaction Design

e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work:   http://maadmob.com.au/
blog:   http://maadmob.net/donna/blog/
AOL IM: maadmob


******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to