Hope Stewart wrote: > There was a thread earlier this year that discussed how images that > are presentational and not part of the content should be placed as > background images through the css and not coded into the html with > the <img>. This makes a lot of sense. > > With all sites I've worked on, I'd say that the company logo falls > into this presentational category. But I wasn't aware of this concept > for my first few sites, so I have some sites where the company logo > is part of the html and others where it is part of the css. > > It is now interesting to compare the two methods and I would argue > that, from a marketing point of view, a company logo should not be a > background image. This is why:
I believe you forgot to mention one thing: Most users expect the logo to be linked to the home page, so in this case it belongs to the (X)HTML markup Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
