Jamie Collins wrote:
Stay away from Strong. Strong is presentational, same as B, and I.
Aeh...excuse me? Since when?
Presentation should be in CSS and content in HTML. use <span class="important"> for text that needs to be emphasised.
Sorry, but that's rubbish. If text *needs to be emphasised* you cannot recommend using a semantically neutral element (span) and relying on a class + css. The emphasis needs to be marked up in the actual content, with elements that semantically signify that emphasis. Emphasis changes the meaning of content, so cannot be divorced from content and split out into an optional presentational component like CSS.
Now, we could debate whether it should be <em> or <strong> (as the difference between the two is minimal, at least in the current HTML spec), but claiming that they're presentational is wrong.
P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team http://streetteam.webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
