If I understand correctly, you're referring to what's called image replaced text.
Personally, I use the "Phark Revisited" method (down a bit in the page): http://www.mezzoblue.com/tests/revised-image-replacement/ Images should never be used for text in the HTML, that is correct. I worked up a small example a couple of weeks ago demonstrating some methods I use: http://www.jsiegfried.com/projects/irrollovers/ir-rollovers.html Hope I've correctly understood your question. And if I have, hope I've helped. Cheers! Jen On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:26:30 1000, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
********************************************************************* WEB STANDARDS GROUP MAIL LIST DIGEST ********************************************************************* Due to an upgrade of SmarterMail, digests seem to have had a problem. We are working on it. ********************************************************************* From: "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:25:35 -0700 Subject: Images as content vs. images as backgrounds Hello list, I've been talking to someone who thinks that a perfectly semantic website has absolutely no <img> tags used for text in images. Could anyone help me find some articles about using img tags vs. using background images for navigation links or textual content where images are being used? -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net .. designtocss.com ************************************************************** Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] **************************************************************
******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
