> Tee G. Peng > Hmmm, I didn't think about that. My clients asked me how to add > *decorative* images by themselves, I asked are they any meaning/ > purpose of those images, are they echo to your content, they said no > I just wanted my page looks nice in certain area. I told them sorry > you can't do that, because if it's decorative purposes I > already took > care of it in the CSS.
For small/medium sites, it may be possible that you've already catered for all decorative situations in your CSS. But if your CMS solution is far more generic, and you need to accommodate for a wide variety of content pages, all with different decorative needs that may not be known from the start, this may not always be the case. > I guess this is just how one interprets 'decorative' :) I don't think we're in disagreement here. Just that I'm thinking of far more generic CMS deployments on large scale sites. P ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Web Editor Enterprise & Development University of Salford Room 113, Faraday House Salford, Greater Manchester M5 4WT UK T +44 (0) 161 295 4779 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.salford.ac.uk A GREATER MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
