Andrew wrote: > Jermayn, > > That one person may find the sitemap useful does not mean that the site > navigation is broken - all that we do know for sure is that one person > likes to use the sitemap. > > If everyone uses the sitemap, then the navigation could well use some > work. > > Similarly - if some internal users find a browse facet based on the > organisational structure helpful, it doesn't mean that it should be > removed. Org structure shouldn't be the only browse facet, sure, but it > can be one of them. >
There aren't any rules. It's a matter of how far you want to go. Some people may even choose to have a full site index of words and phrases. The important thing, I believe, is that if you start off with a site map you should keep it up to date. Many CMS do this, but it's a harder task when the site map is hand coded. Kerry ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
