> Al Sparber wrote: > > The problem is with the standard. If one gets too hung up on semantic > markup > > then there is the risk of bending the logical or implied semantics of > an > > element to suit ones project. I submit that in the absence of a > perfectly > > specific semantically correct element for a given task, a DIV > becomes, by > > default, the logical choice. > > It's not by default at all - it's by design: a DIV is exactly the > correct > element to use when you want to divide a document into divisions or > sections.
I agree with this, but not because it is semantically correct, only because we don't have anything better. Actually, I'd say it is the lack of semantics that makes DIVs the tool of choice for construct. -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
