> When using DIV, what translate that "hierarchy"?
<div id="level1">
<div id="level2">
<div id="level3>I am down the hierarchy :(</div>
</div>
</div>
> This may not make Lists better for construct, but it should
> show that the div element represents nothing at all (as it says in one of
> the 2 links you posted).
I thought DIV represents division, some structural group, some
_generic_ container.
> Because if we are talking "hierarchy" and semantics, I think "something"
> should "reveal" the relationship between these elements.
"something" — like being in the same DIV?
> In the above example, what are the 2 DIVs used as wrappers (instead of the
> OLs) if they are not just structural hacks?
Since when using element for the purpose it was created is a hack?
> At least with the list construct the wrappers *are* semantic.
And how many "semantic" wrappers/containers/whatever are you going to
have in the standard?
No matter the number there will always be need for the generic one —
which DIV is.
<...>
Regards,
Rimantas
--
http://rimantas.com/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
