> On Behalf Of Steve Green > > I have a big problem with the term 'best practice', especially when it > is > used to effectively terminate a discussion. It implies that not only is > there currently no better solution, but that there never will be. > I believe that the most appropriate solution invariably depends on the > context, and find that the principles of the context-driven school of > testing (my main profession) apply to most activities. the first two > are: > > 1. The value of any practice depends on its context. > > 2. There are good practices in context, but there are no best > practices. > > The rest are at www.context-driven-testing.com for those who are > interested. > > As Chris has said, our context is usually that we have limited time and > are > designing to provide the best user experience for people with the user > agents that exist now. If your context is that you have unlimited time > to > create an academic solution for user agents that should exist but > don't, > then it is very likely that you will come to a different solution.
Hi Steve, I'm glad to see that you seem to agree that a script may be a viable solution and that using headings/paragraphs is not the only answer to this problem. -- Regards, Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
