I would personally not be using a p tag too hold the logo? Why would you
want too? you can position as you want without the need for extra
markup. <img src="logo.png" alt="My company logo" width="150px"
height="300px" id="logo" /> - that makes it pretty obvious. of course if
you only have 1 image in the header then you don't need the id either.
Semantically I don't think it needs to be in any other tags at all.
I think if people start think "UO" rather than "SEO" then the answers to
most questions become a lot clearer - UO is a term I coined just the
other day - UO = user optimisation.
Cheers
Adam
Rick Lecoat wrote:
On 29 May 2008, at 05:32, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
We used to have lots of logos in <h1>s too, and after a thorough SEO
discussion we changed that to a <p>.
Out of curiosity, is a logo <img> at the top of the page more
semantically correct when wrapped in a <p> than when it's just on it's
own (ie. not wrapped in anything other than, say, a 'header' <div>)?
--
Rick Lecoat
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
