Cole, from what i can see, if i remove the comment after your head tag
<!--PUT THE PROPER LANGUAGE ID HERE?--> , it changes from "content
looks like transitional" to a matching "content looks like Strict".
Seems in almost every case where i use that extension, it does give
you some some message, i guess the hope is that what it recognizes
matches what it interprets the page to be. Extension creator has this
to say.. although doesn't help a ton:
http://www.htmlpedia.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=66
cheers
On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:39 PM, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
Hi Todd –
Link is here: http://www.koisis.com/.framework/-public/index.php
Yes, I have verified that it’s HTML validator – which is based upon
Tidy - extension that is giving me this info (it’s not an error or
even a warning).
As mentioned, all my pages do validate (as per HTML Validator) as I
always get a green check mark and “0 errors / 0 warnings” at the
bottom-right-hand corner of FF.
As mentioned, no where near an emergency or a problem, but I am just
curious.
Cole
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Budnikas
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 7:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WSG] DocType Given is... Document Looks Like...
Cole, can you post a url so people can see the validator results and
review the code? Everything looks on the up-and-up from what you've
posted. I've never used the FF HTML Validator extension (is it the
one based on HTML Tidy?), so i can't speak for that. The Web
Developer extension just pushes the page to the W3C validator.
Please also verify which Validator of the 2 you're running into
trouble with.
On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Cole Kuryakin wrote:
Hello all –
I’ve got the following doctype at the head of each of my pages:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd
">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
I take great pains to validate everything I do on every page, but,
even if the page shows as valid (using FF’s HTML Validator extension
– or Web Developer extension… I can’t remember which) when I view
source on a “valid” page, I always get an info box that states:
Info: Doctype given is "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Transitional
I don’t think that this is – by any means – any reason for me to be
worried about my code/structure/et. al, but I’ve always wondered
why, if I feed a xhtml 1.0 STRICT doc type why the validator always
says that my stuff looks TRANSITIONAL?
Am I doing something wrong?
Any insight would be appreciated.
Cole
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
