cole,
i get the same thing in the ff html validator.  copied and pasted the
w3c doc type into my document.  must be a bug or something.  as long
as your document validates through the online validator, i wouldn't
worry about it.  it's in the format the w3c recommends.
cheers,
dwain

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Cole Kuryakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all –
>
> I've got the following doctype at the head of each of my pages:
>
> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
>
> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
>
> I take great pains to validate everything I do on every page, but, even if
> the page shows as valid (using FF's HTML Validator extension – or Web
> Developer extension… I can't remember which) when I view source on a "valid"
> page, I always get an info box that states:
>
> Info: Doctype given is "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
>
> Info: Document content looks like XHTML 1.0 Transitional
>
> I don't think that this is – by any means – any reason for me to be worried
> about my code/structure/et. al, but I've always wondered why, if I feed a
> xhtml 1.0 STRICT doc type why the validator always says that my stuff looks
> TRANSITIONAL?
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Any insight would be appreciated.
>
> Cole
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************



-- 
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin
Franklin

*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to