Micky Hulse wrote:
Christian Montoya wrote:
You'll have telepathic computer displays before _real_ XHTML replaces
HTML.
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="mind" href=...
Ha! Nice one.
A while back, I stopped using XHTML strict and switched to HTML 4.01
strict DTD's.
Personally, I think HTML 4.01 strict is a good pick.
I think some would say "It does not matter if the DTD is XHTML/HTML...
As long as it is strict."
This FAQ is a good resource:
"Frequently Asked Questions About XHTML vs HTML"
<http://www.sitepoint.com/forums/showthread.php?t=393445>
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
I made the same decision. I still follow HTML and XHTML, but anything I
do (and have a choice about) is always HTML 4.01 Strict. I think it
makes more sense than XHTML 1.0 Strict at this point since we can't
really use "real" XHTML yet. It seems to defeat the purpose if you are
using a Strict DTD incorrectly.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
