On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Rimantas Liubertas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I made the same decision. I still follow HTML and XHTML, but anything I do >> (and have a choice about) is always HTML 4.01 Strict. I think it makes more >> sense than XHTML 1.0 Strict at this point since we can't really use "real" >> XHTML yet. It seems to defeat the purpose if you are using a Strict DTD >> incorrectly. > > Same here and looking forward to start using HTML5, at least for the > personal projects first.
Interestingly enough, though, I had to use Facebook Connect on a recent project, and in order to use it you have to use XHTML 1.0 Strict with Facebook's xmlns: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xmlns:fb="http://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml";> Then, you use Facebook's AJAX bridge to replace their markup language with data from Facebook. It's not just a valid use of XHTML; it's actually a useful one, too. http://developers.facebook.com/connect.php But unless I'm doing something that justifies it, I stick to HTML 4.01. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
