Perhaps I have missed something important: are we saying that HTML5 is essentially two different languages? I thought that it was supposed to unify the schism between HTML and XHTML.
Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Dorward Sent: 26 November 2008 11:56 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WSG] HTML/XHTML/XML - Question about the future of. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Now I am even more confused! > I was always under the impression that HTML4 and lower were valid SGML. > That XHTML1 and up were valid XML > That XML was valid SGML > > So how the ??? does that leave us with either 'serialisation' of the > new language being in-compatible with SGML? HTML5 is not HTML 4 or lower, or XHTML, or XML (disregarding the XML serialisation, as it isn't the serialisation being discussed). -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/> ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
