Brett Patterson wrote: > From the few recent posts, I have become so far confused, as anyone > would as to why, Gunlaug, you keep stating xHTML5 or as above you say > XHTML5? HTML and xHTML/XHTML are different. xHTML is XHTML, albeit 1.0 > or 1.1 or 2.0 etc. So, is it a typo?
The HTML working group is working on HTML5 which will have two serialisations. A tag soup (and emphatically not SGML) serialisation and an XML serialisation (which they are referring to as XHTML5). The XHTML2 working group is working on all sorts of different things, including XHTML 2.0. See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/XHTML2-WG-charter and http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml-roadmap/ for more. -- David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/> ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
