>From what I have read so far, you are pretty much agreeing with me. Hence,
David, you said and I quote, "HTML 5 is "Everything you need to know to
build a browser" with some definition of HTML, XHTML, DOM, SQL and HTTP in
it.", therefore, HTML5 (not to be confused with xHTML or XHTML), is being
phased out. It would have to be, especially considering the previous
statement. If they are including some definition of HTML with XHTML, then
they are trying to get HTML designers used to using the simplistical form of
XHTML in XML syntax/serialisation/yada yada yada whatever, correct? SQL is a
database manipulation language is it not? Like XML? So, all in all, HTML
developers will move more into what the "purpose" of XHTML is, correct? And
it would have to unify the schism if it is to include all of the above
stated, is that not right? Because everything that has been said seems to
agree with I originally stated and questioned. How does it not?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:12 AM, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Perhaps I have missed something important: are we saying that HTML5 is
> > essentially two different languages?
>
> HTML5 is "Everything you need to know to build a browser" with some
> definition of HTML, XHTML, DOM, SQL and HTTP in it.
>
> > I thought that it was supposed to unify the schism between HTML and
> XHTML.
>
> It certainly doesn't do that.
>
> --
> David Dorward                               <http://dorward.me.uk/>
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************
>
>


-- 
Brett P.


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to