On 18 Aug 2010, at 20:45, tee wrote:


On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:06 AM, jeffrey morin wrote:

It's a good starter book to introduce you to HTML5.  It's not a
reference manual just a good starter book.  You still should read the
W3C spec and get the other book Introduction to HTML5.

I will disagree with Jason Grant that it's too early to start using
HTML5.  Because HTML5 supports the older tags you can start using it
today by simply using <!doctype html> that's it and you're site is now considered html5, and if you're site validated for XHTML or HTML prior
it should validate for HTML5.

Months ago I tried converting a theme to HTML5, but had to give it up for the following reason:

Ran into a number of validation errors with obsolete tags which are no longer supported by HTML5. Though they were all fixable but it gave me a second thought perhaps it's not such a good idea to be progressive with newer markup technology for sites that need to go live today, tomorrow, next year and that I have no control, no way to know how the site owners going to use their sites and how many plugins they will be using which have terribly markup in the template files. I can't remember exactly how many errors I encountered except this one that had me a change of heart because I am not certain of the impact on the WCAG 2.0 success criteria and how today's Screen readers handle the HTML5.

W3C validator flagged Summary attribute as obsolete. Quote: "The summary attribute is obsolete. Consider describing the structure of complex tables in <caption> or in a paragraph and pointing to the paragraph using the aria-describedby attribute." So this is more a validation error than accessibility issue right? TotalValidator doesn't find it wrong. So I assume it's not an accessibility issue, or TotalValidator got it wrong.

”The following attributes are allowed but authors are discouraged from using them and instead strongly encouraged to use an alternative solution:

[…]

"The summary attribute on table. The HTML5 draft defines several alternative solutions."



Last time I checked, browsers are buggy rendering Caption element, not sure if this is still the case but I certainly don't want to go find a hack or invent a hack to make caption element render correctly in all browsers. Aria-described attribute maybe a way to go but I don't know little about
it.

The caption element no longer exists for figures in HTML5. It has been replaced by figcaption. This was because captions were unstylable in browsers outside of tables.



tee





*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [email protected]
*******************************************************************

David Storey

Chief Web Opener / Product Manager, Opera Dragonfly
W3C WG:  Mobile Web Best Practices / SVG Interest Group

Opera Software ASA, Oslo, Norway
Mobile: +47 94 22 02 32 / E-Mail/XMPP: [email protected] / Twitter: dstorey



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [email protected]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to