On 03/06/2015 19:00, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Bill,
Hi John,
>
> Is this the type of hot switching you are referring to?   (From my WSPR log - 
> UDP status output.)
>
> ---
> 14:39:53: Dial: 28124600, Mode: WSPR-2, DX_Call: G4KLA, Report: -15, TX_Mode: 
> WSPR-2, TX_Enabled: 1, Transmitting: 0
> 14:39:53: Dial: 10138700, Mode: WSPR-2, DX_Call: G4KLA, Report: -15, TX_Mode: 
> WSPR-2, TX_Enabled: 1, Transmitting: 0
> 14:39:53: Dial: 28124600, Mode: WSPR-2, DX_Call: G4KLA, Report: -15, TX_Mode: 
> WSPR-2, TX_Enabled: 1, Transmitting: 0
> 14:39:57: Dial: 10138700, Mode: WSPR-2, DX_Call: G4KLA, Report: -15, TX_Mode: 
> WSPR-2, TX_Enabled: 1, Transmitting: 0
> ---
The potential hot switching I am referring to is what would happen if a 
user defined hardware switching routine, for example to change aerials, 
was still in progress when the tune up signal started i.e. switching a 
relay when it is passing Tx RF.
>
> Band hopping:
>
> Do you have in mind producing a selection table with tune up similar to that 
> in the WSPR guide?   This provides a flexible choice of tune-up as well as TX 
> fractions
Currently the only band hopping supported is according to the globally 
coordinated schedule, the constraints of that schedule do not allow for 
per band Tx fractions. Tune up is specified on a per band basis but only 
for the 10 coordinated bands.

My implementation current looks like this:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4192709/band-hopping.JPG

>
> --- John G4KLA
73
Bill
G4WJS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to