Bill --
My experience is that most claims that "program X" decodes JT65 better
than WSJT (or WSJT-X) are the result of using wrong soundcard sample
rates. I seem to remember that JT65-HF doesn't read (or write) *.wav
files, so it's very hard to do a real comparison of the decoders. I
suspect there may be a sample-rate issue, but that's only a guess.
-- Joe
On 9/16/2015 4:01 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 16/09/2015 20:53, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> I don't have the full decode lists for those but the OMs that sent them
>> can easily capture more examples so I will ask for the full list of
>> decodes from both applications with some new examples.
> Looking at the files above, I doubt there are any other decodes apart
> from the ones that WSJT-X gets as they are all on the last dregs of a
> closing 15m band.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
> Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
> in one place.
> SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog!
Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools
in one place.
SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
