Hi Joe, sorry, I should have provided more information. I brought the files here from another conversation elsewhere.
Richard recorded them with a recent build of ^/branches/wsjtx_exp and the other program is JT65-HB9HQX. The decodes I listed are from the other program and as far as I can determine the only other decodes are the ones that WSJT-X recovers. Richard assures me that the settings are correct but as stated above it may not be that simple with two applications running. Agreed the files are a mess but a band looking like that is not uncommon here in EU just before it closes, we have many OTH radar systems active and they often encroach on HF bands along with the usual plasma TVs, dodgy wall-wart PSUs, plastic cased network modems, ... 73 Bill G4WJS. On 16/09/2015 21:41, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Richard and all, > > I don't really understand what's being discussed here. Bill sent me > copies of files with these names: > > 150916_1430.wav > 150916_1433.wav > 150916_1529.wav > 150916_1530.wav > 150916_1531.wav > > I don't know who made the files, or with what program. > > The files are, frankly, a mess: birdies all over the place, a few JT65 > signals, and a few other signals. It's impossible to make any > meaningful decoding comparisons without knowing more details. > > Does JT65-HF (or the HB9??-edition, or whatever) read or write *.wav > files? Not as far as I recall, but maybe I'm wrong. > > What do you think was supposed to be decoded from each of the above > files? Can we see the decoded results? > > If the recordings were made with WSJT-X, was the computer set up > properly with 48 kHz sample rate? > > -- Joe, K1JT > > On 9/16/2015 4:17 PM, Richard Stanley wrote: >> The 15:29 and 15:30 wsjt-x got nothing. >> the 1531 had 1 extra. >> I will put it on 20 mtrs in a bit and post some more wav files here with all >> the info as 15 is pretty dead here. >> The lost decodes are very regular, so regular that I now run wsjt-x and >> jt65-hf-hb9hqx together because wsjt-x is missing to many decodes. >> I did mention it a few weeks back but was upside down with my information. >> >> Richard m0clz >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bill Somerville >> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:01 PM >> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X JT65A Decode performance >> >> On 16/09/2015 20:53, Bill Somerville wrote: >>> I don't have the full decode lists for those but the OMs that sent them >>> can easily capture more examples so I will ask for the full list of >>> decodes from both applications with some new examples. >> Looking at the files above, I doubt there are any other decodes apart >> from the ones that WSJT-X gets as they are all on the last dregs of a >> closing 15m band. >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor Your Dynamic Infrastructure at Any Scale With Datadog! Get real-time metrics from all of your servers, apps and tools in one place. SourceForge users - Click here to start your Free Trial of Datadog now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=241902991&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
