On 27/10/2015 16:13, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Bill, Richard, and all,
Hi Joe,
>
> I guess we need to decide whether there will be a v1.5.1 release.  As
> Bill suggested, an alternative is to offer a v1.6.0-rc1.
My vote is for v1.6.0-rc1 but we probably need some User Guide updates 
before that can happen.
>
> If we do a v1.5.1 release, it would be well to include the corrected
> version of jt65code committed (to v1.6.0) in SVN revision 6000.
>
>       -- Joe, K1JT
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> On 10/26/2015 7:46 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 26/10/2015 23:14, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Bill Somerville
>>> <g4...@classdesign.com <mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is a newer Qt issue, they reorganized some header files and
>>> v1.5 does
>>> not build with QT >= 5.4. I had not worried about it since a v1.6.0
>>> release is probably more likely than a v1.5.1 release.
>>>
>>> If you really need to build V1.5 on FC22 then a bugfix release
>>> could be
>>> tagged.
>>>
>>>
>>> I could just patch it if you have something handy.
>> Attached.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Richard
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to