On 11/11/2015 20:55, Joe Taylor wrote: > Bill, I think the code now used in genStdMsgs is yours. For some reason > did you intentionally de-activate the way Type 1 callsigns were > previously supported? Or am I forgetting the reason something was done > here? Not intentionally Joe, I thought the only changes were to accommodate different ways of working with type 2 compound calls.
Looking into it now. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
