On 12/11/2015 01:02, Joe Taylor wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Joe, > > Your suggestions sound right. Thanks for thinking about these issues. I have committed a change to the development branch which seems to address these issues. > > -- Joe 73 Bill G4WJS. > > On 11/11/2015 7:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: >> On 11/11/2015 23:56, Bill Somerville wrote: >>> For Tx5 we could generate a "<base-call> <base-call> 73" standard >>> message as per the User Guide except for the case where both calls are >>> compound where the "<his-full-call> 73" is required as it is the only >>> confirmation of the correct call being received possible. >> I should clarify here. The above only applies when a type 1 compound c/s >> is involved. When replying to a type 2 compound c/s holder the message >> "<full-call> 73" would be still be generated as you suggest. >> >> 73 >> Bill >> G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
