On 12/11/2015 01:02, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Bill,
Hi Joe,
>
> Your suggestions sound right.  Thanks for thinking about these issues.
I have committed a change to the development branch which seems to 
address these issues.
>
>       -- Joe
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> On 11/11/2015 7:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 11/11/2015 23:56, Bill Somerville wrote:
>>> For Tx5 we could generate a "<base-call>  <base-call>  73" standard
>>> message as per the User Guide except for the case where both calls are
>>> compound where the "<his-full-call>  73" is required as it is the only
>>> confirmation of the correct call being received possible.
>> I should clarify here. The above only applies when a type 1 compound c/s
>> is involved. When replying to a type 2 compound c/s holder the message
>> "<full-call>  73" would be still be generated as you suggest.
>>
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to