Hi Bill,
Your suggestions sound right. Thanks for thinking about these issues.
-- Joe
On 11/11/2015 7:03 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 11/11/2015 23:56, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> For Tx5 we could generate a "<base-call> <base-call> 73" standard
>> message as per the User Guide except for the case where both calls are
>> compound where the "<his-full-call> 73" is required as it is the only
>> confirmation of the correct call being received possible.
> I should clarify here. The above only applies when a type 1 compound c/s
> is involved. When replying to a type 2 compound c/s holder the message
> "<full-call> 73" would be still be generated as you suggest.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
