Joe - 
I like those results! But your S/N axis is shifted by 1 dB relative to what I 
would expect. As I recall, we were getting something like 837 decodes on the 
earlier set of -24dB files. In this latest plot, it looks like sfrsd is 
producing almost 1000 decodes at -24 dB. 
Steve k9an
 
> On Nov 19, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Joe Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Steve and all,
> 
> I've attached a plot comparing the sensitivities for decoding JT65A in WSJT 
> 10.0 (r6088), WSJT-X v1.6-rc1, and WSJT-X v1.7 (r6131).  The simulated 
> channel is AWGN; the demodulators all use noncoherent measurement of symbol 
> amplitudes.  Correlation decoding and message averaging were not used.
> 
> Test measurements were made using 1000 simulated JT65A transmissions at each 
> of the SNRs -20, -21, -22, ... -29 dB.  I ran each program on the full set of 
> files and counted the decodes for each generated SNR.
> 
> WSJT 10 uses the KV decoder and was tuned (a long time ago) for best 
> performance with EME signals.  WSJT-X v1.6 also uses KV, but in this case we 
> tuned for decoding speed, good performance, and few false decodes on crowded 
> HF bands.  WSJT-X v1.7 uses the sfrsd decoder. For these tests I set "Random 
> erasure patterns" to 8, which means  ntrials=10^4.
> 
> As you can see in the plot, in these tests WSJT-X v1.7 is around 0.7 dB 
> better than WSJT10 and 1.3 dB better than WSJT-X v1.6.  I think this is truly 
> superb performance.
> 
> For EME applications we'll want to implement message averaging and 
> correlation decoding.  This should buy us another 4 dB, more or less. These 
> decoding approaches are already present in JT4 mode, and they work well.
> 
> I also need to make comparable tests and measurements for a simulated 
> Rayleigh-fading channel, and for submodes JT65B and JT65C.  I will turn some 
> attention to these tasks, as time permits.
> 
>       -- 73, Joe, K1JT
> <JT65A_decoding.pdf>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to