|
On 3/30/2016 8:38 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
However, as shown in the attached graph JT4F with the Fano decoder is about 1 dB better than JT65C with the FT decoder at Doppler spread 32 Hz, and by even more at larger spreads. Joe, please pardon my truly naif question, but, isn't Fano a decoding algorithm for sequential convolutional coding, while your FT decoder is meant for block RS coding ? Do you mean that JT4F doesn't use RS, while JT65C does ? I am missing something fundamental, I am sure.... --
73 Alberto I2PHD Credo Ut Intelligam |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785471&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
