On 11/04/2017 13:16, Black Michael wrote:
There have been a few asking what power I was running so wanted to add
that to the last message. Was running 5W intially but now running 2W
on my attic dipole. I've had two -01 reports at 2W from my QTH
(Illinois) to NC and VA. Only 73 contacts so far.
I'll poke around the packing routines to see how to fix this.
Hi Mike,
I'm not sure why you are quoting rules to me? You send several messages
during a QSO and have other opportunities to state you are QRP if you
wish. There is no need to add the /QRP suffix to your call for every
instance, in fact by adding when stating you are running 2W you are
stating you are both running 5W or less and running 2W in the same
message, that is unnecessary.
Personally I never run more that 3W on HF with JT65 or JT9 but have
never seen the need to sign as /QRP, I simply use a free text sign off
like "3W 4EL TU 73" or "3W DPL TU 73" which says it all as far as I can see.
I have had a brief look at the encoding routines and can see a few
issues that need addressing, with care as they cover a host of formats
and also support some historical variants. I can see the immediate issue
you reported but I first need to look at why the jt65code test program
is not dealing with type 1 suffixes correctly for example "DE G4WJS/P"
is not being fully decoded.
73
Bill/QRO (IEEE 802.11 2.4GHz @ 100dBm EIRP)
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
