I put out a short guide on setting things up for suffix use.
I'm now using LOTW, eQSL, and QRZ with the /QRP sign quite 
successfully....though about 25% of people still log without the QRP...can tell 
that from eQSL where I get unknown QSOs on the main account. That's one of the 
reasons I wanted to put W9MDB/QRP in the last message was to help emphasize the 
point for logging.

Here's the doc 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qdba84a93wo0qfs/Log4OM%20Secondary%20Callsign.pdf?dl=1


de Mike W9MDB
      From: Claude Frantz <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 9:43 AM
 Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Watts in message
   
On 04/11/2017 02:16 PM, Black Michael wrote:

> In the U.S. it's explicitly legal.

Thanks, Mike !

> The advantage of adding the /QRP is that you will get more responders
> (i.e. stations you have worked before) since the "worked B4" won't
> trigger on their end.  With JT modes in particular if you want to try
> and do WAS on QRP this is pretty much the only way you'll get 'er done
> if you've already done WAS as non-QRP.

Please note that you have often to create secondary accounts on
electronic QSL services when using any suffix.

Now I understand also why I'm not able to complete my WAS. Some states
are simply unreachable for me. I have to understand that some targets
are unreachable for me, the WAS is one of these.

Best wishes,
Claude


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to