I was able to compile v1.7.1-devel with the new mode.  Once up and running I
did spot FA1ABL calling CQ @ 14.079+1300.  I wanted to just lurk awhile
first so I didn't answer him but hoped he would find someone to QSO with.
He didn't.  A while later he spotted me and reported it through HamSpots.
I wasn't sure if it would be reported or not but I was glad to see it was.
The odd thing was that it was reported as Mode T10.  I also noticed that the
dropdown band list did not have an entry for 20m FT8.  I was a simple matter
to add it.  I assume some of this is because FT8 is new and just in the
experimental stage.  Presumably these things will be taken care of in due
course and I understand you developers have more important matters to attend
to.  Thanks for your efforts. 

-73
Dan - K4SHQ

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 10:33 AM
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8: Potential new mode for fast QSOs

Dear Development Colleagues,

Steve (K9AN) and I have developed a potential new mode for WSJT-X. 
We're calling the mode "FT8" (Franke-Taylor design, 8-FSK modulation).

FT8 is designed for situations like multi-hop Es where signals may be weak
and fading, openings may be short, and you want fast completion of reliable,
confirmable QSOs.

Important characteristics of FT8:

   - T/R sequence length: 15 s
   - Message length: 75 bits + 12-bit CRC
   - FEC code: LDPC(174,87)
   - Modulation: 8-FSK, keying rate = tone spacing = 5.86 Hz
   - Waveform: Continuous phase, constant envelope
   - Occupied bandwidth: 47 Hz
   - Synchronization: three 7x7 Costas arrays (start, middle, end of Tx)
   - Transmission duration: 79*2048/12000 = 13.48 s
   - Decoding threshold: -20 dB (perhaps -24 dB with AP decoding, TBD)
   - Operational behavior: similar to HF usage of JT9, JT65
   - Multi-decoder: finds and decodes all FT8 signals in passband
   - Auto-sequencing after manual start of QSO

*Comparison with slow modes JT9, JT65, QRA64:*  FT8 is a few dB less
sensitive but allows completion of QSOs four times faster.  Bandwidth is
greater than JT9, but about 1/4 of JT65A and less than 1/2 QRA64.

*Comparison with fast modes JT9E-H:*  FT8 is significantly more sensitive,
has much smaller bandwidth, uses the vertical waterfall, and offers
multi-decoding over the full displayed passband.

*Still to come, not yet implemented:*  We plan to implement signal
subtraction, two-pass decoding, and use of "a priori" (already known)
information as it accumulates during a QSO.

Three extra bits are available in the message payload, with uses yet to be
defined.  We have in mind special message formats that might be used in
contests, and the like.  Your considered suggestions for use of these bits
are very welcome!

K1JT, K9AN, and G4WJS have conducted on-the-air tests of FT8 with excellent
results.  We're now at a stage where tests under a wider range of conditions
are desirable.  If you can build WSJT-X from source code revision r7750 or
later, and would like to help, please do so and report your results to us!
Pre-built installation packages will be made available after further testing
is completed.

Suggestions for FT8 setup and examples of use can be found in a screen shot
posted here: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/ft8.png

We look forward to receiving your feedback.

        -- 73, Joe, K1JT

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging
tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to