Hi Joe,

I agree with John - using r7836, it worked great for three QSO’s I just made.  
This makes it MUCH easier to get a QSO going - thanks!

One surprise was that it responded to a Tx1 made off-frequency compared to my 
CQ call, but when I think about it that should be the correct behavior.  
Unfortunately, the QSO ended at that point - not sure if it was band fade, or 
just a mistaken reply on the part of VE2MLS.



Thanks for the QSO yesterday too!  :)  It’s an honor to have K1JT in my logbook!

-Tim KD0GYG


> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:15 AM, John Nelson <j...@rmnjmn.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> r7835 with revised Call 1st is working correctly..
> 
> — John G4KLA
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to