Or how about RR 73. Would this not be saved as the grid in your logging
program?
I realize there is nobody living in the grid RR73, but bad data is bad data.
Bad data should never be accepted as a quick fix, IMHO.
On HF, grids (at this time) are pretty much meaningless, but having this
ability in the program will be carried over to VHF (as many already do).
While I’m not against someone sending RR73 or something similar, my concern is
with the logging.
73 de Sebastian, W4AS
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Bill Turner via wsjt-devel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> How about R-73 to avoid confusion with grids RR-73?
>
> Bill, W4WNT
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> <https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Rich - K1HTV
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> G4WJS.
>
>
> Bill,
> Regarding the use of "RR73", I believe that it should be formalized as an
> option to the present "73" TX5 message.
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
