On 7/20/2017 8:39 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
There are plenty of us who DON'T use RR73 as it doesn't save any time
on the slow modes whatsoever, and its an affectation that does not
need to be formalized as part of the protocol (IMHO).
There's a simple solution: if you don't like it, don't use it! (But
you'd be well advised to be prepared to receive it, sometimes.)
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
I use the program as it was designed with double clicking, my two issues
with RR73 were
1. the fact that using the program as designed by double clicking on
such a response would always override the grid which meant having to
look for the original grid sent prior to logging.
2. people saying it 'saved another minute', when in fact it did nothing
of the sort.
However, if the program recognizes RR73 as a Tx5 message, that takes
care of item 1. We'll still have people saying 'saves time' ... when
just following the built-in protocol sequencing used the same amount of
time, so I guess I'll have to live with that faulty logic.
Aside from that .. thanks Joe for another great digital protocol.
Neil, KN3ILZ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
