Bill (G4WJS),
but doesn't that mean you have to redo the logic used by the double
click to change the current function from seeing RR73 as a grid, and
overwriting, then sending a -XX signal report?
I'm also guessing that you would have to make this band specific so its
not used with MS/EME/etc modes which would mess up the normal QSO
there. You have plenty of people still using WSJT v10 that it would
cause headaches for.
There are plenty of us who DON'T use RR73 as it doesn't save any time on
the slow modes whatsoever, and its an affectation that does not need to
be formalized as part of the protocol (IMHO).
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 7/20/2017 1:32 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
On 20/07/2017 17:27, Bill Turner wrote:
How about R-73 to avoid confusion with grids RR-73?
Hi Bill,
that defeats the purpose of RR73, it is because it is a valid grid
that two complete callsigns can be sent with it as a standard message.
You suggestion would require a free text message with a 13 character
(inc. spaces) size limitation.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
