Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My intention was
to say the term should be written as a full word (e.g. “Shorthand”), not
deleted.
George J Molnar, CEM, CHPP
KF2T - Nevada, USA
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi George,
>
>> On 9/21/2017 3:31 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
>> Quick feedback on the repositioned contest mode checkbox. Bravo! Good idea.
>> Before GA release, it might be helpful to clean up the labels and alignment,
>> so everything flows smoothly. ”Sh” could be written out, and maybe NA VHF
>> Contest could distill down to just “Contest.” With appropriate tooltips,
>> think it should be okay.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. A little GUI cleanup is indeed desirable.
>
> Why would you remove "Sh"? In mSK144 mode it's widely used at 144 MHz and
> higher.
>
> What would be *really* helpful is for you to work with someone else and
> thoroughly exercise the new capabilities. Both MSK144 and FT8. The idea is
> that one of you would be trying to make contest QSOs; the QSO partnet might
> or might not be in the contest, or know anything about what "Contest Mode"
> means. Test all possibilities, and report back.
>
> -- Joe, K1JT
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
