Hi George,

On 9/21/2017 3:56 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
Joe, would absolutely not remove sh - it’s incredibly useful. My intention was 
to say the term should be written as a full word (e.g. “Shorthand”), not 
deleted.

RR, understood. Can you find someone with whom to do stress tests of contest mode?

        -- Joe

On Sep 21, 2017, at 12:42 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote:

Hi George,

On 9/21/2017 3:31 PM, George J Molnar wrote:
Quick feedback on the repositioned contest mode checkbox. Bravo! Good idea.
Before GA release, it might be helpful to clean up the labels and alignment, so 
everything flows smoothly. ”Sh” could be written out, and maybe NA VHF Contest 
could distill down to just “Contest.” With appropriate tooltips, think it 
should be okay.

Thanks for the feedback.  A little GUI cleanup is indeed desirable.

Why would you remove "Sh"?  In mSK144 mode it's widely used at 144 MHz and 
higher.

What would be *really* helpful is for you to work with someone else and thoroughly 
exercise the new capabilities.  Both MSK144 and FT8. The idea is that one of you would be 
trying to make contest QSOs; the QSO partnet might or might not be in the contest, or 
know anything about what "Contest Mode" means.  Test all possibilities, and 
report back.

    -- Joe, K1JT

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to