I think the main problem why people are having such a problem with this
TX=RX thing is as far as I know in my Amateur Radio life time ( Been
Licensed since 1975 ) that 99% of our way of operating, was "Zero Beating"
It was good Amateur Practice to "Zero Beat" the station you are in
contact with.
And how Operation with FT8 while it looks like say a PSK-31 signal,
Where to work a PSK-31 station your "Receiver" has to be on the other
stations signal.
FT8 people just do not understand yet that your receiver IS the whole
window! You can be anywhere in that window and be heard.
Now this gives me thought. Since we are listening to that whole window,
How to word this,,,,
OK, a Station is operating at 1500 in the waterfall, and of course you
see him,
Your recv indicator is at 2000,
Is there any performance gain, if you moved your rcv indicator to 1500?
Or is performance the same on recv regardless of where the indicator is
positioned?
If it IS the same, Then Wow! Why have the indicators at all? This would
really blow peoples mind. Have FT8 operate kind of like WSPR, where the
program decides the best possible chance of least amount of interference
is to transmit on and thats where it does transmit?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 10/18/2017 2:57 AM, David Alloza wrote:
Hi Bill,
Lock Tx=Rx was useful with my too drifting Tx. When I use FT8 autoseq
the drifting is automatically compensed along the QSO.
Is there anyway to keep this behavior ?
My 73,
David F4HTQ.
*De :*Bill Somerville [mailto:[email protected]]
*Envoyé :* mercredi 18 octobre 2017 09:27
*À :* [email protected]
*Objet :* Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT 1.8.0 RC3
On 18/10/2017 02:38, Gary McDuffie wrote:
On Oct 17, 2017, at 3:49 PM, Dave Thorpe<[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
I have suggested elsewhere to have an option to LOCK or HOLD which will
both
address the accessibility issue and satisfy those who prefer the HOLD
function.
I’ve seen some of the other threads you mentioned this in. I could have
missed it, but I didn't see an explanation for what LOCK or HOLD means. To me,
LOCK and HOLD a frequency mean the same thing.
Hi Gary,
the old "Lock Tx=Rx" button caused the Tx or Rx to always follow the
other when changed. This was undesirable because you were no longer in
control of your Tx frequency, e.g. it would follow that of your QSO
partner. An analogy might be that on phone or CW your rig
automatically followed your QSO partner's frequency changes without
any regard for what QRM to others it might cause.
Hold Tx on the other hand simply fixes your Tx frequency such that
actions that might move it like answering a CQ call no longer do so,
i.e.you are still in full control of your station equipment but can
choose to operate at an offset from your QSO partner that you choose.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
