Let's see now.
#1 Those using CAT control -- 100% accurate spot reporting#2 Those not using
CAT control -- a small number, and why do we need their spots when accuracy is,
probably, nowhere close to 100%?
So yes...I do want to prevent those from doing pskreporting. IMHO the errors
cause more of a problem than the benefit of the reporting.
The more complex solution is to prompt the user who has "None" selected and
PskReporting checked to ensure they really want to do that.But they will still
make mistakes.
de Mike W9MDB
On Thursday, October 26, 2017, 11:54:50 AM CDT, David Tiller
<[email protected]> wrote:
Do you really want to preclude those of us that choose to not use CAT control
from reporting spots? That seems like a bit of an extreme solution for such a
small problem.
I would think the benefit of having more spots would help the whole community
more than the harm done by a few misplaced spots.
It seems to me the data collector should be curating the spots in the first
place, only accepting those that are reported by more than 1 station. That's a
real solution that doesn't alienate a good bit of the ham population.
--
| David Tiller | Senior Manager |
| [email protected] |
| c 804.304.0638 / o 804.355.0511 |
|
|
|
|
| Best Firms 2016 #2 in Information Technology |
From: Black Michael via wsjt-devel <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 12:46 PM
To: WSJT software development
Cc: Black Michael
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] False Frequency reports Here's a one-liner that
should prevent psk reports if the rig is "None".
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zb920h4s0puibyn/oktopost.patch?dl=1
de Mike W9MDB
On Thursday, October 26, 2017, 3:32:44 AM CDT, Hasan al-Basri
<[email protected]> wrote:
If that was fixed, I missed it! It would be wonderful if that's the case. I'll
have to watch for it. Tnx tip
73, N0AN
Hasan
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Gary McDuffie<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 7:51 PM, Hasan al-Basri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> A radio connection does not prevent false reports from being sent to pskr. If
> one switches frequencies at just the right time, the report will be wrong,
> even if cat control is being used.
I thought that was corrected in an earlier version. Reports stop for a brief
time after changing frequencies???
I still think disabling pskreporter reports being sent when not using working
CAT is a simple fix.
Gary - AG0N
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
______________________________ _________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]. net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org!
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
