> In passing one might note that CAT control is not a panacea against bad > reports.
Exactly! The data is never going to be perfect - there are enough intrinsic bad decodes even on the correct freq that get reported up. As any careful data consumer knows, you must clean and curate any dataset you use. That includes weeding out spots that appear once on band A but are matched by multiple simultaneous spots on band B. > On Oct 26, 2017, at 17:52, G8DQX (WSJT developers on SF) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > In passing one might note that CAT control is not a panacea against bad > reports. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
