For what it's worth: I kinda like the new color scheme and the possibility to tailor the colors to my own preferences (I'm red/green color blind). With an option to turn colors off/on, I'd be one happy customer. Thanks for the good work of the development team!
OH6VDA Tom > 26. sep. 2018 kl. 18:21 skrev Mike <biounit.m...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks for the feedback everyone! I appreciate it and look forward to future > improvements. > > Mike - N5INP > >> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:55 AM Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: >> Thanks to everyone who commented on the color-highlighting of decoded >> messages in WSJT-X 2.0-rc1 and -rc2. We appreciate hearing all the >> sentiments expressed: they ranged from "keep it simple" and "better as >> it was" to "more options are needed". >> >> As most subscribers here know, in general we in the WSJT Development >> Group devote our greatest efforts toward innovations in protocol design: >> source encoding, error-control coding, modulation/demodulation schemes, >> related DSP algorithms, and the like. The underlying "guts" that make >> these weak-signal modes work. Surely our contributions to Amateur Radio >> in these areas are among our most important. >> >> We also try to make the finished product -- in this case WSJT-X -- >> convenient and enjoyable for users. However, going too far in this >> direction requires a lot of time... and it's often impossible to satisfy >> everyone. We have therefore shied away (for example) from building >> full-featured logging facilities into WSJT-X. Excellent programs with >> such facilities already exist. >> >> The scheme and logic used for color highlighting in WSJT-X 2.0-rc1 and >> -rc2 was intended as exploratory, by no means final. Excellent >> "alerting" facilities already exist (for Windows) in JTAlert. If we >> keep anything like the color highlighting that's now there, we'll >> certainly add some switches so you can back it off or disable unwanted >> parts. We'll also consider the possibility that this is a case of "less >> is more", especially when it's arguably redundant. >> >> -- 73, Joe, K1JT >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
