Yes, The most evident problem is exactly this, IMHO: too many "WSJT-X surrogates" around are delaying the huge mass to swap to WSJT-X version 2.0, 77-bit FT8.
-- 73 de Marco, PY1ZRJ Il 19/11/18 12:16, Ryan Tourge ha scritto: > I suspect a large population is using one of the mutants (JTDX etc.) > and probably don't even know about any of this. That said... I have > used both and WSJT-X pretty much offers everything now that I looked > for in JTDX. > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:34 AM dgb <n...@bayland.net > <mailto:n...@bayland.net>> wrote: > > Amen!!!! > > I tried RC4 for the last hr. with CQ's on 160-30 and got many > replies but not one using RC4!! > > Apparently a very small part of the population using RC4. > > What's it going take to get them to change their ways? ;-) > > 73 Dwight NS9I > > > On 11/17/2018 4:01 AM, Krzysztof Krzemiński wrote: >> Ladies and gentelmen, HAMs, >> >> Where is the ham spirit? >> >> Quite nobody WW is using RC4. >> >> Let's start and run RC4, nobody will do it in your name. >> >> Even if new, super contact "do not change colour on your log". >> >> Help Joe and his team. >> >> Kris, SP5NOH >> >> >> Wysłano z TypeApp <http://www.typeapp.com/r?b=14070> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
