Hi Dave, There are still some Ops out there that simply don't read. What can I say? I agree with you RR73 should be answered by a 73 and the QSO is complete. Although I have had many QSOs in which the other Op either didn't send a final 73 or I didn't copy it. That brings me to the next question... If another station calls me following my RR73 to the last QSO is there a chance that the last Ops 73 won't be decoded, particularly if the second calling Op is several db stronger?? I think this is part of what Joe and the team are trying to improve in ver 2.0 so that both the calling Op and the 73 OP will both be decoded in the same time slot. This will be a huge improvement! 73, Rory, K5CKS
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:26 AM Saku <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Maybe because of this. > > > https://www.google.fi/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://hf.r-e-f.org/c4_iaru_r1/10vienne/VIE10_C4_11%2520QSO%2520definition.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiEko_F4eXeAhUCBiwKHU6VBOIQFjAAegQIABAB&usg=AOvVaw0V-30uPteK4he8PsRKJC6r > > "Conclusion. 1c" at the end of document is read so that confirmation of > confirmations must be received both sides. > > I.e your 73 will confirm her RR73 to be received. > > -- > Saku > OH1KH > > 20. marraskuuta 2018 20.54.09 GMT+02:00 Dave Hachadorian < > [email protected]> kirjoitti: >> >> I tried using the following sequence in the contest last night. >> >> I SEND (TX6) CQ RU K6LL DM22 >> >> SHE SENDS (TX2) K6LL K7ABC 569 AZ >> >> I SEND (TX3) K7ABC K6LL R 579 AZ >> >> SHE SENDS (TX4) K6LL K7ABC RR73 >> >> I SEND (TX6) CQ RU K6LL DM22 >> >> >> It worked OK sometimes, but several callers kept coming back for more >> info, apparently looking for that final (TX5) “73” from me. I guess I >> don’t understand why they were looking for that. When I send TX3, the R >> tells her that I got her report. When she sends RR73, she tells me that >> she got my report. The QSO data has gone into the log at both ends and all >> is good. Why can’t I start an immediate CQ, and why doesn’t the automatic >> sequence follow that pattern? It would shorten the QSO time from 90 >> seconds to 60 seconds. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL >> Yuma, AZ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
