I looked at it. Saw the UI screen shots. No thanks. Sticking with WSJT-X. 73
-Jim NU0C On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 10:58:27 -0500 Neil Zampella <ne...@techie.com> wrote: > Nope ... > > Last month .. still using the same encoder/decoder .... at least the > name of the executable was finally changed last year. > .. and the UI is horrible. > > Neil, KN3ILZ > > On 12/1/2018 8:07 AM, Wolfgang wrote: > > Re: [wsjt-devel] "FT8 Roundup" mock contest Hello Neil, > > > > sorry, > > > > I have to ask this: do you get paid to show your 'clonophobia' ;-) > > > > People having a different opinion about UI design. Right now, the > > pskreporter.info is telling us, 15% of the total number of users > > using the, from you so hated, 'clones'. > > > > When was it the last time, you checked one of the 'clones', before > > you made such statements? > > > > 73 de Wolfgang > > OE1MWW > > > > > > Saturday, December 1, 2018, 12:57:30 PM, you wrote: > > > > *> For what reason? The clone teams are using the 77 bit WSJT-X code, > > > and to many people that program window UI is horrible. > > > > > Neil, KN3ILZ > > > > > > > > *---------- > > Amateur radio is the most expensive type of free-of-charge communication! > > Amateurfunk ist die teuerste Art der kostenlosen Kommunikation! -- "Good men don’t need rules. Today is not the day to find out why I have so many." - Doctor Who _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
