Hi Tom.

 

Yes, a robot FT8 CQer that instantly jumped to the frequencies of its chosen 
callers would be a nightmare, especially if it then stayed put to call CQ.

 

There are still quite a few [human|robot] stations who either don’t understand 
or simply disagree with split-by-default on FT8 … but month by month ever since 
FT8 was released the proportion has steadily fallen.  Today, I suspect many of 
them are newcomers to FT8, used to simplex-by-default on the legacy modes.   
[Personally, I’d welcome the option for the auto-responder to drop simplex 
callers to the bottom of its priority list, but maybe that’s just me.]

 

Re propagation, I believe we are at the bottom of the solar cycle about now.  
About a year ago I saw a report of the first new-cycle sunspot (with a 
different magnetic polarity?) so hopefully we’re on the up.  Now’s a good time 
to get your fill of low-band DX!   [In just a few years when propagation is 
better and the FT8 frequencies become crowded, auto-responding to the weakest 
callers first will make even more sense.]

 

73
Gary  ZL2iFB

 

From: Tom Ramberg via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
Sent: 04 April 2019 00:38
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Tom Ramberg <oh6...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone released an Auto CQ mod - my 2 cents

 

Hello Jari, I’m happy to see  that we’ve made contact on my little 
JW-expedition. These days it seems that SSB is closed from here, but a few FT8 
signals are maiking it. As far as robots are concerned, I cannot do coding, but 
I wonder if the urge to have the «hold tx freq» unticked is robotic or human? 
Anyway, that is the most annoying habit of all, wether its a human or a robot. 
As soon as I’ve found a clear spot, you can bet on someone either calling me on 
the frequency, or starts calling somebody else. And believe me, propagation 
being what it is these days on 78 degrees northern latitude, that is more than 
enough to make me lose a qso. If the frequency was Clear, no qsy should be 
necessary (like in SSB), but here I have to jump all the time. Gary, so much  
for Your point no. 4.

 

73 de Tom from JQ78tf

 

Sendt fra E-post <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986>  for Windows 
10

 

Fra: Gary Hinson <mailto:g...@isect.com> 
Sendt: onsdag 3. april 2019 kl. 02:18
Til: 'WSJT software development' <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
Emne: Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone released an Auto CQ mod - my 2 cents

 

Hi Jari,

 

I look forward to making contact with you some day.   You’re definitely not the 
only disabled DXer and, yes, you should be flattered that we can’t readily tell 
as much from the far side.  Amateur radio is a great leveler!

 

So, how might we identify fully-automated/robotic FT8 stations?  That’s a good 
question.  We could do with an amateur radio version of the Turing test 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test> .

 

Here are some possible indicators of automation/robotic FT8 operation:

*         Operating 24x7, or at least for extended periods whereas most hams 
would need or choose to take breaks;

*         Operating simultaneously on several bands and/or modes – not just 
CQing on repeat but making conventional QSOs in parallel, beyond SO2R; 

*         Always and only using auto-sequencing with standard messages – no 
friendly greetings or off-the-cuff comments and responses during or at the end 
of their QSOs, easily confused by out-sequence-of and custom messages;

*         Static audio frequency for all transmissions – no QSYing to avoid QRM;

*         Regularly timed band-changes e.g. moving to LF at 1700z daily, or 
exactly one hour before local sunset maybe;

*         Absence from DXpedition fox-n-hounds pileups – for now, at least (and 
hopefully forever!);

*         Frank admissions by their operators, or evasive/dubious answers if 
challenged about this.

None of these is definitive, though, and all could be defeated if someone was 
determined, competent and perverse enough to do so.  In fact, technical 
challenge is a driver for much of amateur radio.  Mastering the technology is 
highly motivational for some, even if things lose their attraction and become 
boring once mastered.  Further tranches of hobbyists love tinkering with 
technology designed by others, or building stuff, or using it for social 
reasons, or pushing back the frontiers of science, or fixing and maintaining 
stuff, or collecting it, or competing with it … or whatever.  To my mind, it’s 
unreasonable and unrealistic to expect everyone else to conform to our 
individual perspectives.  Tolerance and consideration towards others are a 
necessary part of the hobby since we share so much – not least the airwaves.

73
Gary  ZL2iFB

 

From: Jari A <oh2...@gmail.com <mailto:oh2...@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 03 April 2019 09:46
To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Someone released an Auto CQ mod - my 2 cents

 

Hi Guys, this is OH2FQV / Jari

 

I'm handicap operator, within my physical limitations, main thing I do at my 
day time is working on 20m FT8. I dont have much else to do. I spend most of my 
hours with pc and radio. I may have 50 qso's per day, even more if theres extra 
activity on the band.

 

I have had few emails to telling me to stop my illegal robot/ automated 
operation on FT8.

 

The truth: I do everything manually. I dont even use JTalert to assits. 

I'm so ilirate, that I cant do programing, or so to automate my operations. 

 

There do are stations with automation, but I'm not one of those.

 

I'm sorta flattered of having those comments of being machine like operator.... 

 

I dont know, but doing mass working with stations is fun for me,  as much fun 
like at the fair to shot down disks (ducks) with crooked BB-gun. 
Shot and ding - and make guy in the booth frustrated... 

 

Please dont get upset with me, I'm just silly old man having fun - manually

 

Very best regards,

 

: Jari / oh2fqv

 

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:15 PM Gary McDuffie <mcduf...@ag0n.net 
<mailto:mcduf...@ag0n.net> > wrote:



> On Mar 31, 2019, at 17:02, Jim Shorney <jshor...@inebraska.com 
> <mailto:jshor...@inebraska.com> > wrote:
> 
> The guy seems to be on the air making FT8 contacts just about every time I 
> turn it on....

Must be CO8LY (I think that’s his suffix).  I see him on the air every time I 
walk into the shack.

I suspect that the Antarctic station that was active yesterday was a robot.  
Why?  Because from early morning to evening, his operation never changed that I 
saw.  He called CQ, came back to people who apparently didn’t hear him, ran to 
the end of the watchdog, and immediately called CQ again the next sequence.  He 
never moved more than 3 cycles (Hertz for the kids) all day.  I don’t think he 
worked much either.  I was surprised at how many people he replied to with an r 
report, and didn’t complete the QSO.  He always ran the length of his watchdog 
though and immediately called CQ again without moving or pausing.

Gary - AG0N

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

 

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to