How about the log function saving the last power setting per band vs just last 
regardless of band as it does now. That would help me (and probably quite a few 
others) a lot as I usually do not change power once set on a band, but have 
varying levels per band because of equipment capability, wanted QSO’s and 
propagation.

Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
Los Osos, CA USA



> On Jun 24, 2019, at 20:11, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> 
> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:21:36 +0100
> From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com <mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>>
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Question for WSJT-X Programmers re: Tx power
>       logging
> Message-ID: <c7a02021-eca1-ffed-8246-6e811ba93...@classdesign.com 
> <mailto:c7a02021-eca1-ffed-8246-6e811ba93...@classdesign.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 24/06/2019 18:46, Dave Slotter wrote:
>> I was wondering, if WSJT-X uses HamLib, and at least some rigs are 
>> capable of setting and getting the transmit power, why do users have 
>> to fill in the Log QSO Field, "Tx power", manually? Is there a reason 
>> for not implementing this feature?
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> the main reason is inaccuracy. Using AFSK modes allows the power to be 
> controlled in many ways including using the audio level into the rig. 
> The power setting on the rig may have little bearing on the actual 
> radiated power. The rigs that allow metering the power leaving the 
> transceiver PA could be more accurate but require constant polling of 
> the Tx power meter level while transmitting. Even if the above were not 
> an issue, an individual station may be using a PA after the transceiver. 
> In summary, the user has a much better idea of the radiated power than 
> any indirect measurement available via CAT commands.
> 
> For a counter example, measuring SNR of received signals is far more 
> deterministic and reliable and we happily support that as an automated 
> feature in the WSJT-X modes.
> 
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.

_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to